Wednesday, October 30, 2013
Monday, October 28, 2013
This week’s DVD releases
Plenty of blame to go around for Cowboys loss
That sound you just heard was Calvin Johnson (81) catching another pass against the Cowboys |
Tony Romo and the Cowboys offense didn’t do much either. Romo had a total of 206 yards passing. The Lions’ Matthew Stafford had 211 yards passing in the fourth quarter alone.
Two of Romo’s tosses went for 60 yards to Terrance Williams and 50 to Dez Bryant, misleading numbers because most of those yards were the result of excellent runs after the catch by Williams and Bryant. In fact, I wish the NFL would break up those statistics, awarding the quarterback only the yardage between the throw and the catch, and awarding the receiver the rest.
But I digress. Take away those 110 yards and Romo was a pathetic 12 of 28 (a horrendous 43 percent completion rate) for only 96 yards. 96 YARDS? If you’re only going to pass for 96 yards you’d better have one super strong running game.
So let’s look at the Cowboys rushing stats. Ahem. The Cowboys rushed for a grand total of 62 yards yesterday. The Lions’ Reggie Bush alone rushed for 92.
There’s a program on ESPN called Numbers Never Lie. They sure don’t in this case. The Cowboys offense was just as much to blame for this loss as the defense. And don’t forget – the Lions’ margin of victory could have been significantly greater were it not for the four turnovers registered by that much maligned defense.
Mind you, I’m not absolving the defense for its performance yesterday. I’m just saying there’s plenty of blame to share.
Sunday, October 27, 2013
My Top 25 College Football Teams
Last week's rank in parenthesis
1. Alabama 8-0 (2)
2. Florida State 7-0 (1)
3. Oregon 8-0 (3)
4. Ohio State 8-0 (7)
5. Stanford 7-1 (6)
6. Baylor 7-0 (5)
7. Missouri 7-1 (4)
8. Clemson 7-1 (8)
9. Auburn 7-1 (12)
10. Texas A&M 6-2 (15)
11. Miami, Fla. 7-0 (10)
12. Arizona State 5-2 (11)
13. LSU 7-2 (9)
14. South Carolina 6-2 (20)
15. Oklahoma 7-1 (18)
16. BYU 6-2 (25)
17. Louisville 7-1 (17)
18. UCLA 5-2 (13)
19. Michigan State 7-1 (NR)
20. Texas Tech 7-1 (14)
21. Georgia 4-3 (19)
22. UCF 6-1 (22)
23. Oklahoma State 6-1 (NR)
24. Wisconsin 5-2 (21)
25. Michigan 6-1 (24)
Dropped out: Oregon State (23), Virginia Tech (16).
1. Alabama 8-0 (2)
2. Florida State 7-0 (1)
3. Oregon 8-0 (3)
4. Ohio State 8-0 (7)
5. Stanford 7-1 (6)
6. Baylor 7-0 (5)
7. Missouri 7-1 (4)
8. Clemson 7-1 (8)
9. Auburn 7-1 (12)
10. Texas A&M 6-2 (15)
11. Miami, Fla. 7-0 (10)
12. Arizona State 5-2 (11)
13. LSU 7-2 (9)
14. South Carolina 6-2 (20)
15. Oklahoma 7-1 (18)
16. BYU 6-2 (25)
17. Louisville 7-1 (17)
18. UCLA 5-2 (13)
19. Michigan State 7-1 (NR)
20. Texas Tech 7-1 (14)
21. Georgia 4-3 (19)
22. UCF 6-1 (22)
23. Oklahoma State 6-1 (NR)
24. Wisconsin 5-2 (21)
25. Michigan 6-1 (24)
Dropped out: Oregon State (23), Virginia Tech (16).
Goodnight, Lou
I first came in contact with Lou Reed in 1967 with the release of that great album The Velvet Underground & Nico, which contains the song in the above video. It is my favorite Lou Reed song, although I will admit enjoying walking on the wild side with Lou. I am going to miss him. Lou Reed died today, six months after undergoing a liver transplant.
Friday, October 25, 2013
Bye bye A.C.
Interim City Manager A.C. Gonzalez (left) and Mayor Mike Rawlings |
I was talking to a high ranking Dallas city official (who will remain nameless for obvious reasons) during a particular budget townhall meeting a couple of months ago and I asked this person (not even going to reveal my source’s gender) how things were going in the managerial offices at Dallas City Hall. "Not well,’ this person said rather frankly. "You could cut the tension with a knife."
When this person told me that I knew some of what was going on in the City Manager’s department. Mary Suhm had resigned as city manager and her first assistant, A.C. Gonzalez, had assumed the position as the interim city manager, a position he will hold until the City Council names Suhm’s replacement. The tension, I believed, revolved around the fact that Suhm was still occupying the office set aside for the city manager while Gonzalez had to remain in the office designated for the first assistant city manager. I could understand why Gonzalez might be put out by this, but I thought it was petty. As for Suhm she had her own history to serve as precedent. When her predecessor, Teodoro Benavides, resigned as city manager and Suhm, his first assistant, was named interim city manager, she remained in her own office until the City Council officially confirmed her to replace Benavides.
But reading the article in the Dallas Morning News today about the Uber transportation debacle, there might have been more to it than just a spite over office space. Although Suhm was as anxious as Gonzalez to get an ordinance passed that would put Uber out of business, it now appears, according to an investigation into the whole process initiated by Mayor Mike Rawlings, that the two differed significantly on how to get it passed. Gonzalez wanted to push it though with as little discussion and notice as possible. Therefore he had it placed on the very next available consent agenda to be considered by the City Council. Items on the consent agenda are passed en masse without discussion (unless some watchdog council person notifies the city secretary early enough to get the item pulled from the consent agenda to be considered individually, but that practice sort of went out of fashion when Mitchell Rasansky left the council a half dozen years or so ago). Suhm, on the other hand, vehemently disagreed with this process, according to the mayor’s report released yesterday. She favored the more traditional process — taking the proposed ordinance to an appropriate council committee for discussion and debate prior to placing it on the full council’s agenda.
That kind of strong disagreement between the two most powerful individuals on the city’s staff could definitely cause tension that could be cut with a knife.
As anyone following this story knows by now, the mayor and a majority of the city council agreed with Suhm and disagreed with Gonzalez. It wasn’t the proposed ordinance that came under review by the report, but the process by which Gonzalez took it to council. The mayor’s report was a devastating blow to the interim city manager who has made no secret of the fact that he wants the word "interim" removed from his title.
It ain’t gonna happen.
One thing is clear from all this — A.C. Gonzalez has absolutely no chance of being named by this council as the next city manager. He has tried to fall on his sword with an apology that seemed too well crafted to be genuine (i.e., it came across as something written for him and not sentiments from his heart). But this particular paragraph from the Morning News’s story is devastating for Gonzalez’s future:
Sam Merten, the mayor’s spokesman, said no disciplinary action will be taken against Gonzalez. "But this incident will be evaluated as part of his overall job performance when he’s considered for the full-time job," Merten said.
You don’t have to read that closely between the lines of that paragraph to realize Gonzalez could save himself a lot of embarrassment by withdrawing his name from consideration right now. Especially when he has to deal with city council demagogues like Philip Kingston, who, according to the News’s story, said this entire affair "did confirm my assumption that the Uber debacle was not the result of discrete instances of poor judgment. It resulted from a culture in the manager’s office of removing policymaking authority from the council."
Kingston, of course, is wrong. As the mayor’s report shows, the entire mess was the result of a discrete instance of poor judgment — a judgment that most within the city manager’s department disagreed with. But Kingston is emerging as another one of those council members, like Scott Griggs and the aforementioned Rasansky, who is never going to let the truth stop him from what he wants to complain about, especially when it comes to the city personnel.
But what he is putting on the table is that no one currently employed by the City of Dallas has a chance of becoming the next city manager. In fact, Gonzalez probably did the council a favor by effectively removing himself from consideration. The council believes one way to show it is racially unbiased is by picking persons for positions based on race. For example, if voters elect a mayor who is white, the mayor pro temp must be either black or Hispanic. And if a black is chosen, than a Hispanic is named deputy mayor pro temp.
So here’s going to be the council’s thinking process on this. The last city manager was a white female. Her predecessor was a Hispanic male. So the next city manager needs to be African-American and other than Police Chief David Brown there is not a single African American on the city’s staff qualified to be city manager. (Sorry, Forest Turner, but that’s the truth.)
Which makes me think: Where’s Charles Daniels when we need him?
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
Texas escalates its war on women
Not content to simply deny women the health care they need, Texas Republicans are now doing their best to disenfranchise women.
It’s interesting that at a time when a Democratic woman candidate is mounting a serious campaign for the governor of the state, that Republicans are doing their best to prevent as many women from voting as they possibly can.
As I wrote earlier, the only way for Republicans to have any chance of winning contested elections is to prevent Democrats from voting and so far Texas has been successful in making sure blacks, Hispanics and college students don’t vote (although those successes are being challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice).
But now there is a new threat to Republican supremacy. Support for state senator Wendy Davis skyrocketed after her electrifying filibuster earlier this year. Women, tired of seeing Republicans control their reproductive rights, are gravitating to the Democratic Party in increasingly larger numbers (the 2012 Presidential election revealed the largest gender gap between the candidates in history) and Davis’ candidacy is attracting even more women to the Democrats.
So what’s a Republican to do? They gotta pass laws to prevent as many women from voting as possible.
Beginning Nov. 5, voters must present a photo identification to vote. It is estimated that 25 percent of African Americans and 16 percent of Hispanics do not possess an ID that would satisfy the Texas requirements. Eighteen percent of individuals over 65 carry no photo ID at all. Student ID cards issued by colleges and universities are not acceptable. These are the groups that tend to vote overwhelmingly Democratic and women are joining their ranks.
Here’s how the law disenfranchises a little more than a third of all women voters in Texas. The photo ID women show must contain their up-to-date legal name. That means if a woman is married, but her ID still lists her single name, she can’t vote. By the same token, if a woman is divorced, but her license still has her married name on it, sorry.
Now I have not poured through every law book in the state of Texas, but as far as I can tell right now, there is no law that requires a married woman to take her husband’s surname as her legal name. But you must take that name and put it on your license if you want to vote in Texas.
The estimated 34 percent of women disenfranchised by this law can obtain a state-issued ID that will allow them to vote but in order to obtain this ID they must provide an original birth certificate AND an original marriage license or divorce decree. Photocopies will not be accepted.
It costs about $20 to obtain original copies of those documents so forcing women to pay that money, plus the costs of mailing and handling, amounts to a poll tax, something expressly prohibited by the 24th Amendment. But Texas’s racist, misogynist Republicans have never let some piddling trifle such as the U.S. Constitution stop them before, so why should they start now?
It’s interesting that at a time when a Democratic woman candidate is mounting a serious campaign for the governor of the state, that Republicans are doing their best to prevent as many women from voting as they possibly can.
As I wrote earlier, the only way for Republicans to have any chance of winning contested elections is to prevent Democrats from voting and so far Texas has been successful in making sure blacks, Hispanics and college students don’t vote (although those successes are being challenged by the U.S. Department of Justice).
But now there is a new threat to Republican supremacy. Support for state senator Wendy Davis skyrocketed after her electrifying filibuster earlier this year. Women, tired of seeing Republicans control their reproductive rights, are gravitating to the Democratic Party in increasingly larger numbers (the 2012 Presidential election revealed the largest gender gap between the candidates in history) and Davis’ candidacy is attracting even more women to the Democrats.
So what’s a Republican to do? They gotta pass laws to prevent as many women from voting as possible.
Beginning Nov. 5, voters must present a photo identification to vote. It is estimated that 25 percent of African Americans and 16 percent of Hispanics do not possess an ID that would satisfy the Texas requirements. Eighteen percent of individuals over 65 carry no photo ID at all. Student ID cards issued by colleges and universities are not acceptable. These are the groups that tend to vote overwhelmingly Democratic and women are joining their ranks.
Here’s how the law disenfranchises a little more than a third of all women voters in Texas. The photo ID women show must contain their up-to-date legal name. That means if a woman is married, but her ID still lists her single name, she can’t vote. By the same token, if a woman is divorced, but her license still has her married name on it, sorry.
Now I have not poured through every law book in the state of Texas, but as far as I can tell right now, there is no law that requires a married woman to take her husband’s surname as her legal name. But you must take that name and put it on your license if you want to vote in Texas.
The estimated 34 percent of women disenfranchised by this law can obtain a state-issued ID that will allow them to vote but in order to obtain this ID they must provide an original birth certificate AND an original marriage license or divorce decree. Photocopies will not be accepted.
It costs about $20 to obtain original copies of those documents so forcing women to pay that money, plus the costs of mailing and handling, amounts to a poll tax, something expressly prohibited by the 24th Amendment. But Texas’s racist, misogynist Republicans have never let some piddling trifle such as the U.S. Constitution stop them before, so why should they start now?
Monday, October 21, 2013
My Top 25 College Football Teams
Last week's rank in parenthesis
1. Florida State 6-0 (3)
2. Alabama 7-0 (1)
3. Oregon 7-0 (2)
4. Missouri 7-0 (6)
5. Baylor 6-0 (7)
6. Stanford 6-1 (10)
7. Ohio State 7-0 (8)
8. Clemson 6-1 (4)
9. LSU 6-2 (5)
10. Miami, Fla. 6-0 (14)
11. Arizona State 5-2 (22)
12. Auburn 6-1 (21)
13. UCLA 5-1 (9)
14. Texas Tech 7-0 (17)
15. Texas A&M 5-2 (12)
16. Virginia Tech 6-1 (19)
17. Louisville 6-1 (13)
18. Oklahoma 6-1 (20)
19. Georgia 4-3 (11)
20. South Carolina 5-2 (15)
21. Wisconsin 5-2 (24)
22. UCF 5-1 (NR)
23. Oregon State 6-1 (25)
24. Michigan 6-1 (NR)
25. BYU 5-2 (NR)
Dropped out: Florida (16), Utah (23), Washington (18)
1. Florida State 6-0 (3)
2. Alabama 7-0 (1)
3. Oregon 7-0 (2)
4. Missouri 7-0 (6)
5. Baylor 6-0 (7)
6. Stanford 6-1 (10)
7. Ohio State 7-0 (8)
8. Clemson 6-1 (4)
9. LSU 6-2 (5)
10. Miami, Fla. 6-0 (14)
11. Arizona State 5-2 (22)
12. Auburn 6-1 (21)
13. UCLA 5-1 (9)
14. Texas Tech 7-0 (17)
15. Texas A&M 5-2 (12)
16. Virginia Tech 6-1 (19)
17. Louisville 6-1 (13)
18. Oklahoma 6-1 (20)
19. Georgia 4-3 (11)
20. South Carolina 5-2 (15)
21. Wisconsin 5-2 (24)
22. UCF 5-1 (NR)
23. Oregon State 6-1 (25)
24. Michigan 6-1 (NR)
25. BYU 5-2 (NR)
Dropped out: Florida (16), Utah (23), Washington (18)
This Week’s DVD Releases
Friday, October 18, 2013
Republicans aren’t going to win too many contested elections without cheating; so, naturally, they’re cheating
A Republican will never be elected President of the United States again in my lifetime. Now, admittedly, I’m an old codger with limited years of breathing left to me, but I’m betting I have around 15 years left in me.
And a Republican is not going to win the presidency again in the next 15 years, perhaps even in the next 30 unless there is a massive transformation in that party.
What’s more, Republicans know this. Especially Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives know this. That’s why they shut down the government. It had nothing to do with Obamacare — that was just the handy, as the great Alfred Hitchcock called it, McGuffin. House Republicans, realizing they are not going to win another Presidential election perhaps even in Ted Cruz’s lifetime, shut down the government in a disastrous and failed attempt to render the office of President powerless and invest more power into their representative body. Their thinking was that Republican state legislatures, like the one here in Texas, have gerrymandered House districts to such a degree that it would require all-time stupidity on their part to lose their House majority. (They may have blundered into such a scenario, but that’s a topic for another day.)
The 2012 Presidential election painted a vivid picture of a new American electorate — an electorate that is more like the country’s growing minority-majority population, an electorate dominated by African-Americans, Hispanics and women vitally concerned with issues concerning controlling their own health choices. This electorate is not going to vote Republican and House Republicans know this.
But, of course, they can always try to cheat the system and you’re seeing that more and more today. That cheating is taking place in three ways. First, not content with simply gerrymandering to insure white male Republicans maintain their edge, GOP legislatures are passing voter suppression laws to prevent Democrats from voting. Look at the draconian voter suppression laws recently passed in Ohio, North Carolina and Texas, laws that are so blatant in North Carolina and Texas that they are being challenged by the Justice Department.
Second, Republicans are staging voter purges to remove Democrats from the list of registered voters. This is being conducted most prominently by Republican state leaders in Florida and Virginia, two states posed to get rid of their Republican governors in the next election cycle and replace them with Democrats, unless those governors can succeed in removing those pesky Democrats from the rolls of qualified voters. Nowhere is this more blatant than in Virginia where the state’s chief elections officer, its attorney general, has ordered the purge of 38,870 individuals from the rolls of eligible voters. Why? Because that attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, is also the Republican nominee for governor (he’s the first Virginia elected official in 35 years not to resign his office while running for another elected position) and, with just a few weeks to go before the election, polls show Cuccinelli running about eight percentage points behind Democrat Terry McAuliffe. Now off-year elections always have low voter turnouts and Republicans always fare better when turnouts are low, so Cuccinelli personally preventing 38,000 potential McAuliffe voters from going to the polls is a very big deal.
Third, Republicans are trying to change the way Presidents are elected. These Republican legislatures are drafting laws that would eliminate the winner-takes-all-the-state’s-Electoral-College-votes system and replace it with Electoral College voting being apportioned among the state’s congressional districts. If that law had been in place in the last Presidential Election, Mitt Romney would have won the Presidency with 83 more electoral votes than Barack Obama, even though Obama won the popular vote by more than five million.
So even Republicans know they can’t win without cheating. Let’s look at those Republicans who are considered right this minute to be the leading contenders in the 2016 Presidential election. They are Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan and Chris Christie. I don’t think I left anyone off that list. The first four names on that list shamed themselves last night by voting to keep the U.S. government closed (a closure that, according to Standard & Poor’s, cost the American economy $24 billion) and plunge the country into economic chaos. A snowball stands more of a chance of surviving for 30 seconds in a running microwave oven than anyone who cast a vote against re-opening the government has of winning the Presidency. As for Christie, I don’t think the whackos who control the GOP nominating process will permit him to be their party’s nominee.
So if they can’t wind on their policy decisions, what chance do they have? Well, there’s always cheating.
And a Republican is not going to win the presidency again in the next 15 years, perhaps even in the next 30 unless there is a massive transformation in that party.
What’s more, Republicans know this. Especially Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives know this. That’s why they shut down the government. It had nothing to do with Obamacare — that was just the handy, as the great Alfred Hitchcock called it, McGuffin. House Republicans, realizing they are not going to win another Presidential election perhaps even in Ted Cruz’s lifetime, shut down the government in a disastrous and failed attempt to render the office of President powerless and invest more power into their representative body. Their thinking was that Republican state legislatures, like the one here in Texas, have gerrymandered House districts to such a degree that it would require all-time stupidity on their part to lose their House majority. (They may have blundered into such a scenario, but that’s a topic for another day.)
The 2012 Presidential election painted a vivid picture of a new American electorate — an electorate that is more like the country’s growing minority-majority population, an electorate dominated by African-Americans, Hispanics and women vitally concerned with issues concerning controlling their own health choices. This electorate is not going to vote Republican and House Republicans know this.
But, of course, they can always try to cheat the system and you’re seeing that more and more today. That cheating is taking place in three ways. First, not content with simply gerrymandering to insure white male Republicans maintain their edge, GOP legislatures are passing voter suppression laws to prevent Democrats from voting. Look at the draconian voter suppression laws recently passed in Ohio, North Carolina and Texas, laws that are so blatant in North Carolina and Texas that they are being challenged by the Justice Department.
Second, Republicans are staging voter purges to remove Democrats from the list of registered voters. This is being conducted most prominently by Republican state leaders in Florida and Virginia, two states posed to get rid of their Republican governors in the next election cycle and replace them with Democrats, unless those governors can succeed in removing those pesky Democrats from the rolls of qualified voters. Nowhere is this more blatant than in Virginia where the state’s chief elections officer, its attorney general, has ordered the purge of 38,870 individuals from the rolls of eligible voters. Why? Because that attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli, is also the Republican nominee for governor (he’s the first Virginia elected official in 35 years not to resign his office while running for another elected position) and, with just a few weeks to go before the election, polls show Cuccinelli running about eight percentage points behind Democrat Terry McAuliffe. Now off-year elections always have low voter turnouts and Republicans always fare better when turnouts are low, so Cuccinelli personally preventing 38,000 potential McAuliffe voters from going to the polls is a very big deal.
Third, Republicans are trying to change the way Presidents are elected. These Republican legislatures are drafting laws that would eliminate the winner-takes-all-the-state’s-Electoral-College-votes system and replace it with Electoral College voting being apportioned among the state’s congressional districts. If that law had been in place in the last Presidential Election, Mitt Romney would have won the Presidency with 83 more electoral votes than Barack Obama, even though Obama won the popular vote by more than five million.
So even Republicans know they can’t win without cheating. Let’s look at those Republicans who are considered right this minute to be the leading contenders in the 2016 Presidential election. They are Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan and Chris Christie. I don’t think I left anyone off that list. The first four names on that list shamed themselves last night by voting to keep the U.S. government closed (a closure that, according to Standard & Poor’s, cost the American economy $24 billion) and plunge the country into economic chaos. A snowball stands more of a chance of surviving for 30 seconds in a running microwave oven than anyone who cast a vote against re-opening the government has of winning the Presidency. As for Christie, I don’t think the whackos who control the GOP nominating process will permit him to be their party’s nominee.
So if they can’t wind on their policy decisions, what chance do they have? Well, there’s always cheating.
Monday, October 14, 2013
My Top 25 College Football Teams
Last week's rank in parenthesis
1. Alabama 6-0 (2)
2. Oregon 6-0 (3)
3. Florida State 5-0 (1)
4. Clemson 6-0 (4)
5. LSU 6-1 (9)
6. Missouri 6-0 (13)
7. Baylor 5-0 (7)
8. Ohio State 6-0 (8)
9. UCLA 5-0 (11)
10. Stanford 5-1 (5)
11. Georgia 4-2 (6)
12. Texas A&M 5-1 (17)
13. Louisville 6-0 (16)
14. Miami, Fla. 5-0 (12)
15. South Carolina 5-1 (19)
16. Florida 4-2 (14)
17. Texas Tech 6-0 (18)
18. Washington 4-2 (15)
19. Virginia Tech 6-1 (20)
20. Oklahoma 5-1 (10)
21. Auburn 5-1 (22)
22. Arizona State 4-2 (23)
23. Utah 4-2 (NR)
24. Wisconsin 4-2 (NR)
25. Oregon State 5-1 (NR)
Dropped out: Arizona (24), Michigan (21), Oklahoma State (25)
1. Alabama 6-0 (2)
2. Oregon 6-0 (3)
3. Florida State 5-0 (1)
4. Clemson 6-0 (4)
5. LSU 6-1 (9)
6. Missouri 6-0 (13)
7. Baylor 5-0 (7)
8. Ohio State 6-0 (8)
9. UCLA 5-0 (11)
10. Stanford 5-1 (5)
11. Georgia 4-2 (6)
12. Texas A&M 5-1 (17)
13. Louisville 6-0 (16)
14. Miami, Fla. 5-0 (12)
15. South Carolina 5-1 (19)
16. Florida 4-2 (14)
17. Texas Tech 6-0 (18)
18. Washington 4-2 (15)
19. Virginia Tech 6-1 (20)
20. Oklahoma 5-1 (10)
21. Auburn 5-1 (22)
22. Arizona State 4-2 (23)
23. Utah 4-2 (NR)
24. Wisconsin 4-2 (NR)
25. Oregon State 5-1 (NR)
Dropped out: Arizona (24), Michigan (21), Oklahoma State (25)
This Week’s DVD Releases
Wednesday, October 9, 2013
UT athletics should stage its own commando raid
Mack Brown and Rick Barnes |
Texas football coach Mack Brown’s immediate future will be decided Saturday. If he manages to pull off a miracle akin to convincing House Speaker John Boehner to call a vote on a temporary budget resolution, then his job is secure, at least for the foreseeable future. If, however, Oklahoma embarrasses the Longhorns once again — a result most sane observers expect — he’s history. Gone. Finished.
No, he won’t be fired immediately. Athletic Director DeLoss Dodds won’t pull him off the team bus as it prepares to leave the Cotton Bowl. In fact, he won’t be fired at all — he’s done too much that’s positive for the Texas football program to suffer that indignity. But it will be made clear to him that he will have no choice other than to announce his resignation at the end of the current football season.
And don’t forget, Dodds has also indicated he plans to retire as well.
Lost in all this discussion about Brown and Dodds is the fact that Texas’ basketball fortunes have gone further into the depths than the football program and that baseball has not fared all that well recently either (the Horns didn’t even qualify for the Big 12 tournament last season).
I think coach Augie Garrido can salvage UT baseball. I have absolutely no faith that Brown or basketball coach Rick Barnes can do the same.
Tom Jurich |
Louisville AD Tom Jurich is one of the best heads of an athletic department you’re going to find. In 2007, Jurich was named Street & Smith’s national athletic director of the year. However, I’m afraid too many members of UT’s Board of Regents (the majority of which were appointed by former Texas A&M yell leader Gov. Hair) want a lawyer type and not an athletic savvy person in that position. Which is a shame because that could doom UT athletics to mediocrity for decades.
Rick Pitino |
Finally, there’s Louisville football coach Charlie Strong. Strong has a (pardon me for saying this)
Charlie Strong |
Which is why the naming of Jurich as AD is so important. Once that chip falls, the other two could follow. Louisville fans would hate UT forever, but that, in my book, is a small price to pay to restore UT athletics to prominence.
Monday, October 7, 2013
My Top 25 College Football Teams
Last week's rank in parenthesis
1. Florida State 5-0 (3)
2. Alabama 5-0 (1)
3. Oregon 5-0 (2)
4. Clemson 5-0 (6)
5. Stanford 5-0 (4)
6. Georgia 4-1 (5)
7. Baylor 4-0 (8)
8. Ohio State 6-0 (9)
9. LSU 5-1 (10)
10. Oklahoma 5-0 (11)
11. UCLA 4-0 (13)
12. Miami, Fla. 5-0 (20)
13. Missouri 5-0 (19)
14. Florida 4-1 (18)
15. Washington 4-1 (7)
16. Louisville 5-0 (14)
17. Texas A&M 4-1 (12)
18. Texas Tech 5-0 (17)
19. South Carolina 4-1 (15)
20. Virginia Tech 5-1 (21)
21. Michigan 5-0 (NR)
22. Auburn 4-1 (NR)
23. Arizona State 3-2 (16)
24. Arizona 3-1 (23)
25. Oklahoma State 4-1 (NR)
Dropped out: Maryland (24), Mississippi (25), Northwestern (22).
1. Florida State 5-0 (3)
2. Alabama 5-0 (1)
3. Oregon 5-0 (2)
4. Clemson 5-0 (6)
5. Stanford 5-0 (4)
6. Georgia 4-1 (5)
7. Baylor 4-0 (8)
8. Ohio State 6-0 (9)
9. LSU 5-1 (10)
10. Oklahoma 5-0 (11)
11. UCLA 4-0 (13)
12. Miami, Fla. 5-0 (20)
13. Missouri 5-0 (19)
14. Florida 4-1 (18)
15. Washington 4-1 (7)
16. Louisville 5-0 (14)
17. Texas A&M 4-1 (12)
18. Texas Tech 5-0 (17)
19. South Carolina 4-1 (15)
20. Virginia Tech 5-1 (21)
21. Michigan 5-0 (NR)
22. Auburn 4-1 (NR)
23. Arizona State 3-2 (16)
24. Arizona 3-1 (23)
25. Oklahoma State 4-1 (NR)
Dropped out: Maryland (24), Mississippi (25), Northwestern (22).
This week’s DVD Releases
Friday, October 4, 2013
Tom Hanks could snare two acting Oscar nominations
Here's how I see the major Oscar nominations shaping up as of the first of October:
PICTURE
12 Years a Slave
American Hustle
August: Osage County
The Butler
Captain Phillips
Gravity
Inside Llewyn Davis
The Monuments Men
Saving Mr. Banks
The Wolf of Wall Street
DIRECTOR
Alonso Cuaron, Gravity
Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips
Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave
David O. Russell, American Hustle
Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street
ACTOR
Bruce Dern, Nebraska
Chiwetel Ejofor, 12 Years a Slave
Tom Hanks, Captain Phillips
Matthew McConaughey, Dallas Buyers Club
Robert Redford, All Is Lost
ACTRESS
Cate Blanchett, Blue Jasmine
Sandra Bullock, Gravity
Judi Dench, Philomena
Meryl Streep, August: Osage County
Emma Thompson, Saving Mr. Banks
SUPPORTING ACTOR
Daniel Bruhl, Rush
Michael Fassbender, 12 Years a Slave
John Goodman, Inside Llewyn Davis
Tom Hanks, Saving Mr. Banks
Jared Leto, Dallas Buyers Club
SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Jennifer Lawrence, American Hustle
Margo Martindale, August: Osage County
Lupita Nyongo, 12 Years a Slave
Octavia Spencer, Fruitvale Station
Oprah Winfrey, The Butler
PICTURE
12 Years a Slave
American Hustle
August: Osage County
The Butler
Captain Phillips
Gravity
Inside Llewyn Davis
The Monuments Men
Saving Mr. Banks
The Wolf of Wall Street
DIRECTOR
Alonso Cuaron, Gravity
Paul Greengrass, Captain Phillips
Steve McQueen, 12 Years a Slave
David O. Russell, American Hustle
Martin Scorsese, The Wolf of Wall Street
ACTOR
Bruce Dern, Nebraska
Chiwetel Ejofor, 12 Years a Slave
Tom Hanks, Captain Phillips
Matthew McConaughey, Dallas Buyers Club
Robert Redford, All Is Lost
ACTRESS
Cate Blanchett, Blue Jasmine
Sandra Bullock, Gravity
Judi Dench, Philomena
Meryl Streep, August: Osage County
Emma Thompson, Saving Mr. Banks
SUPPORTING ACTOR
Daniel Bruhl, Rush
Michael Fassbender, 12 Years a Slave
John Goodman, Inside Llewyn Davis
Tom Hanks, Saving Mr. Banks
Jared Leto, Dallas Buyers Club
SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Jennifer Lawrence, American Hustle
Margo Martindale, August: Osage County
Lupita Nyongo, 12 Years a Slave
Octavia Spencer, Fruitvale Station
Oprah Winfrey, The Butler
Wednesday, October 2, 2013
Baseball playoff predictions
I really like the addition of a second wild card team in the playoffs, but I would much rather see the wild card playoff be a best two-out-of-three-game series instead of a one-game winner-take-all. Regardless, here's how I see the rest of the playoffs going:
AMERICAN LEAGUE DIVISION SERIES
Detroit over Oakland
Tampa Bay over Boston (upset special)
NATIONAL LEAGUE DIVISION SERIES
Los Angeles over Atlanta
St. Louis over Pittsburgh
AMERICAN LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES
Detroit over Tampa Bay
NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES
St. Louis over Los Angeles
WORLD SERIES
Detroit over St. Louis
It's worth noting (bragging) that I nailed these predictions last year, so this year I'm predicting the Detroit Tigers will be getting a measure of revenge.
AMERICAN LEAGUE DIVISION SERIES
Detroit over Oakland
Tampa Bay over Boston (upset special)
NATIONAL LEAGUE DIVISION SERIES
Los Angeles over Atlanta
St. Louis over Pittsburgh
AMERICAN LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES
Detroit over Tampa Bay
NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES
St. Louis over Los Angeles
WORLD SERIES
Detroit over St. Louis
It's worth noting (bragging) that I nailed these predictions last year, so this year I'm predicting the Detroit Tigers will be getting a measure of revenge.
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
My Top 25 College Football Teams
Ratings from two weeks ago in parenthesis
1. Alabama 4-0 (1)
2. Oregon 4-0 (2)
3. Florida State 4-0 (3)
4. Stanford 4-0 (11)
5. Georgia 3-1 (6)
6. Clemson 4-0 (9)
7. Washington 4-0 (16)
8. Baylor 3-0 (14)
9. Ohio State 5-0 (10)
10. LSU 4-1 (4)
11. Oklahoma 4-0 (8)
12. Texas A&M 4-1 (5)
13. UCLA 3-0 (12)
14. Louisville 4-0 (17)
15. South Carolina 3-1 (13)
16. Arizona State 3-1 (15)
17. Texas Tech 4-0 (NR)
18. Florida 3-1 (21)
19. Missouri 4-0 (NR)
20. Miami, Fla. 4-0 (22)
21. Virginia Tech 4-1 (NR)
22. Northwestern 4-0 (20)
23. Arizona 3-1 (24)
24. Maryland 4-0 (NR)
25. Mississippi 3-1 (19)
Dropped out: Georgia Tech (23), Michigan (18), Oklahoma State (7), Wisconsin (25)
1. Alabama 4-0 (1)
2. Oregon 4-0 (2)
3. Florida State 4-0 (3)
4. Stanford 4-0 (11)
5. Georgia 3-1 (6)
6. Clemson 4-0 (9)
7. Washington 4-0 (16)
8. Baylor 3-0 (14)
9. Ohio State 5-0 (10)
10. LSU 4-1 (4)
11. Oklahoma 4-0 (8)
12. Texas A&M 4-1 (5)
13. UCLA 3-0 (12)
14. Louisville 4-0 (17)
15. South Carolina 3-1 (13)
16. Arizona State 3-1 (15)
17. Texas Tech 4-0 (NR)
18. Florida 3-1 (21)
19. Missouri 4-0 (NR)
20. Miami, Fla. 4-0 (22)
21. Virginia Tech 4-1 (NR)
22. Northwestern 4-0 (20)
23. Arizona 3-1 (24)
24. Maryland 4-0 (NR)
25. Mississippi 3-1 (19)
Dropped out: Georgia Tech (23), Michigan (18), Oklahoma State (7), Wisconsin (25)
Casual Observations (mainly about government irresponsibility)
- Anyone who thinks the government shutdown has anything to do with Obamacare isn’t paying attention. A significant group of Republican right-wing-nuts were elected to the House of Representatives in 2010 by promising to shut down the government. This irresponsible move by a minority of Republican lunatics is not a tactic to achieve some end, it is the end itself, as far as these jerks are concerned.
- Opinion polls reflect this reality. In a CNN/ORC International poll released yesterday only 10 percent of Americans polled said they approved of how Congress is operating and a whopping 87 percent disapprove. What’s worse for the GOP, according to a Quinnipiac University poll, only 17 percent approve of how Republicans are handling government affairs and 74 percent disapproved. (Democrats’ approval rating was 32 percent, not great, but almost twice as high as Republican, and up 1 percent from the last poll).
- Ironically, one of the many programs the shutdown won’t affect is the Affordable Care Act. In fact, beginning today, Americans can go on-line to purchase their own affordable health insurance from one of the many available exchanges. It all starts right here.
- Today also marks the 55th anniversary of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. It will be celebrated by only about 550 of NASA’s 28,000 employees. Those 550 are needed to keep operational those satellites currently circulating the globe. The rest have been told not to report to work today because of the government shutdown.
- And, finally, speaking of polls, according to a poll conducted by the arch-conservative Fox News Network, 47 percent of Americans oppose Obamacare (a figure I found incredibly low, considering the source of the poll). However, that same poll revealed only 34 percent of Americans oppose the Affordable Care Act. I guess those poll results reveal more about the intelligence level of those watching Fox News than anything else. "Here is a prediction for you," President Obama said last week. "A few years from now, when people are using this to get coverage and everyone’s feeling pretty good about all the choices and competition that they’ve got, there are gonna be a whole bunch of folks who say, ‘Yeah, yeah, I always thought this provision was excellent. I voted for that thing.’ You watch. It will not be called Obamacare."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)