I’m convinced they should be and I’m also convinced there’s a sensible way of paying them that would allow university compliance officials to track how athletes spend the money they receive and prevent athletes from abusing the system.
Here’s the reality of the situation. Colleges will recruit athletes, many, if not most of them, from backgrounds that would not afford them a college education if they had to pay it for it themselves. Their tuition is provided, and, in most cases, their schoolbooks are paid for, they are given room and board in a dormitory and that’s it. If they want to go to a movie, if they want to treat a date to a dinner at Chili’s, if they want to purchase a new polo shirt, they must do that with their own coin. Yet NCAA is so restrictive on how athletes can earn extra money, it’s no wonder some of them are attracted to outside, often illegal, benefactors.
I’m not going to speculate on how much money should be loaded on the cards each month, only to argue it should be tied to a cost-of-living index of the school’s locale. But the member NCAA universities should be the final arbiter of that. I would also argue that a female athlete on a volleyball scholarship should receive the same monthly allotment as the school’s starting quarterback.
I’m convinced this is a sensible solution and a workable plan. Which means the NCAA will never adopt it.
1 comment:
Great article! It seems it's time college athletes should be paid. The NCAA has held down this racket for a long time. If they don't change, more than $2,000 per year, they're going to fall. The debate over at TC Huddle got me thinking about this. I wondered what other people were saying and found your opinion.
Thanks for the post! Enjoyed it. Here's the article that led me here if you're curious: http://www.tchuddle.com/2011/07/pay-the-kid-the-earned-dollars-of-college-athletes/
-Mike
Post a Comment