Search 2.0

Sunday, March 22, 2009

New York Times, speaking on behalf of all unemployed Texans, says: Damn you to hell, Rick Perry

Echoing what I said a couple of days ago, albeit in words that were far less emotional and far mote literate, the New York Times contained an editorial in its Saturday editions essentially damning Rick Perry for playing partisan politics in a situation that called for compassion, statesmanship and leadership, characteristics Perry is obviously lacking. The Times' editorial said:

Republican governors who have been threatening to refuse federal aid rather than sensibly expand state unemployment insurance programs are putting ideology ahead of the needs of their constituents.

The two most prominent grandstanders — Rick Perry of Texas and Bobby Jindal of Louisiana — should listen to lawmakers and taxpayers in their own states who are demanding that they do what’s best for their most vulnerable citizens.

Or if that’s not enough, they should look at what other sensible governors — both Democrat and Republican — are doing throughout the rest of the country: accepting the aid as a lifeline for pulling their states and the country out of desperation.

The unemployment portion of the federal stimulus package offers generous support to the states. To accept it, these states must make two reasonable changes in their unemployment insurance law. They must expand eligibility requirements that bar too many low-income workers from receiving compensation. And they must choose from a menu of options that include extending benefits to part-time workers and those who leave jobs because of family emergencies.

The claim by some governors that the unemployment aid would lead directly to tax increases has also been discredited. New taxes are triggered automatically when unemployment trust funds fall below specified levels. In many cases, filling their coffers with stimulus aid would actually postpone tax increases. When the stimulus money is spent, states would also be free to revert to the old unemployment insurance laws.

In Texas, Governor Perry’s decision to reject the money has sown considerable anger in the State Legislature. A House committee urged the full Legislature to overturn the governor’s decision. Lawmakers acted after seeing projections that the state unemployment fund was on track to run out of money in the fall, which would drive up taxes. ...

The time has clearly passed for posturing. With large numbers of people losing their jobs, Mr. Jindal and Mr. Perry need to do what is best for their states and their struggling workers.

Nice words. Of course, Perry is more interested in pandering to that segment of the Republican party he feels will vote for him over Kay Bailey Hutchinson in next year's GOP gubernatorial primary than in doing what is best for Texas and its struggling workers. But then Perry has never cared about struggling workers. I guess I shouldn't be surprised or shocked that he continues to act without compassion, statesmanship or leadership.

No comments: